SEO Tricks: Hugo Guzman: Deconstructing the Google 'Brand?' Algorithm

[SEO Manager]

Hugo Guzman: Deconstructing the Google 'Brand?' Algorithm
 

<p>So here we are on Tuesday, March 3 rd, and I&rsquo;m still trying to fully digest the implications of Aaron&rsquo;s &ldquo;You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login&rdquo; post from last Wednesday, February 25. The data that was presented, the context that was provided and the labyrinth of insightful user comments that were spawned left me reeling for days. So much so that I wouldn&rsquo;t be surprised if the annals of SEO history associate February 25, 2009 as the infamous &ldquo;Aaron Wall&rdquo; update.</p>

<p>In all seriousness, though, this really is a big deal, especially for folks like me who spend their days attempting to optimize mainstream &ldquo;Big Brand&rdquo; web sites for a living. I&rsquo;m fortunate enough work for You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, and my team strives to deliver a truly comprehensive approach to SEO &ndash; blending site-side factors, link building, social media elements, and analytics. We usually do a pretty darn good job, despite the myriad of obstacles and pitfalls associated with trying to implement SEO for a large, lumbering, Fortune 500 web portal. And sadly, like many big firms out there, we have occasionally chalked up our shortcomings to a lack of implementation and cooperation on the part of the client. It&rsquo;s that typical &ldquo;not our fault, it&rsquo;s a crappy big brand site&rdquo; copout that many of us have heard a thousand times before.</p>

<p>Then along comes Aaron with his revelations about Google&rsquo;s recent algorithm shift and its ramifications for big brands, and all hell breaks loose:</p>
<ul>
  <li>I immediately spiral into You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login regarding me and my team&rsquo;s marketing abilities</li>
  <li>I start scrambling to deconstruct this alleged algorithm shift</li>
  <li>I start emailing all of my senior team members asking them to attempt deconstructing the algorithm shift</li>
  <li>they roll their eyes and one of them tells me stop sending so many random emails at 10 o&rsquo;clock at night</li>
</ul>
<p>I&rsquo;ve calmed down a bit since then, but I&rsquo;m still hard at work trying to figure out exactly what levers have caused certain &ldquo;Big Brand&rdquo; sites to skyrocket in the SERPs while others remain mired in search engine mediocrity. As with most things in life, the best course of action is to introduce a bit of the old scientific method, systematically isolating variables in an attempt to identify predictable patterns that can be replicated.</p>

<p>After taking a high-level look at each of the keywords outlined in Aaron&rsquo;s post, and the corresponding brand sites that made the jump onto the front page, several possible culprits become apparent. Here are a couple that jumped out at me:</p>

<p>Social Media Signals &ndash; companies like University of Phoenix have made a concerted effort to engage users via social media channels, and those social reverberations could be a key facet in Google&rsquo;s newly refined algorithm, especially if some of those reverberations include mention of the phrase &ldquo;online degree.&rdquo;</p>

<p>Increased weighting of anchor text within internal site linkage &ndash; companies like American Airlines seem to be leveraging both their own internal site pages as well partner sites to increase the volume of anchor text occurrences for the term &ldquo;airline tickets&rdquo; (although they&rsquo;re missing out on some seriously low-hanging fruit by failing to optimize the alt. image attribute on their global logo image link). If Google has decided to increase the potency of this element, then large brand portals with voluminous amounts of internal pages and partner sites (or branded micro sites) could gain an upper hand for highly competitive terms.</p>

<p>Increased sensitivity to offline marketing campaigns &ndash; Perhaps Google&rsquo;s algorithm is getting better at recognizing site traffic associated with offline marketing campaigns. This would extremely difficult to do without having direct access to a site&rsquo;s analytics data (although Google Analytics conspiracy theorists are convinced that this is already the case for sites using GA) but perhaps Google is using signals such as the relative volume of specific search queries (e.g. branded queries like &ldquo;State Farm&rdquo;) and somehow tying that data back to terms that the algorithm associates with the given brand query (e.g. State Farm = Auto Insurance).</p>

<p>Disclaimer: I haven&rsquo;t been able to actually test these hypotheses out thoroughly or with any real semblance of scientific method. After all, it&rsquo;s only been five days since I read the post, and I do have other things to do besides ponder the ramifications of this alleged algorithm shift (it&rsquo;s 10pm so I have to start annoying my team with random emails again).</p>

<p>Besides, Google&rsquo;s results could roll back at any moment, rendering all of these insights (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) moot. Still, if you&rsquo;re in any way involved in optimizing web sites for big brands (or if you just want to improve your eye for SEO) it&rsquo;s probably a good idea to start doing a little scientific testing of your own.</p>

<p>If you liked this post (or even if you thought it was a flaming pile of dog excrement) feel free to reach out to me via my Twitter handle: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login</p> <!--break-->
 

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login