Counterclockwise: Galaxy S phones, Omnia, Kindle Fire

[DP]

Counterclockwise: Galaxy S phones, Omnia, Kindle Fire

<img src="http://cdn.gsmarena.com/...This TV Show is available upon demand...This means if you want the download link for this show, you should  reply here and we will reply  for you the download link ASAP...So please if you want to download this please don't hesitate reply here and we will be more than happy to post it for you..../newsimg/14/01/this-day-5-years-ago/thumb.jpg" width="70" height="92" hspace="3" alt="" border="0" align=left style="background:#333333;padding:0px;margin:0px 4px 0px 0px;border-style:solid;border-color:#aaaaaa;border-width:1px" /> <p>Welcome to this week's edition of Counterclockwise - our weekly article that looks back in time at what happened over the same seven days in the last few years. This time around, we take a retrospective look at the future of smartphones, see how Android and Android app stores have developed over time and remember a natural disaster.



The way of the future

Touchscreens or at least tech similar to them has existed for decades, they are nothing new. Except no one took them seriously as the way of the future until in January 2007 Apple revealed the iPhone.

In March 2008, LG announced it will be offering the Touch Web phone in its home country. It wasn't the company's first touch-operated phone though, that honor belongs to the LG KE850 Prada announced just before the original iPhone in January 2007.



A year later in March 2009 Samsung a leak revealed that Samsung is really stepping up its touchscreen game with thirteen new devices - an upgrade of the Windows Mobile-running Omnia phone and Samsung's first Android.






Speaking of screens, a fairly recent study published in March 2012 stated that the ideal screen size is 4-4.5&quot;. According to Strategy Analytics 90% of people wanted a big screen, especially Android users.



Back then the analyst firm pointed to web browsing, gaming and multimedia as the primary drivers for screen growth, but we guess it underestimated how much those things will overshadow the basic use for a phone - calling. Android has long since blown past the 4.5&quot; size and 5&quot;-5.2&quot; will be this year's premier screen size. Unless you get a 5.5+ inch phablet, of course.

Non-telephony uses for smartphones were becoming more and more important and in March 2011 there was a dual-core shootout - to see which chipset can best handle the growing needs of growing screens and more complicated games and web sites.



Interestingly, the Snapdragon chipset lost to the Cortex-A9 chipsets. Of course, back then the Scorpion core was getting old and Qualcomm still hadn't unveiled the Krait core, which a couple of years later will go on to dominate the market.

Playing cards

While phone makers are free to pick any screen or chipset supplier, they do have to agree on certain things - like the size and shape of SIM cards. That proved easier said than done.

After miniSIMs had ruled the phone world for years, microSIM caused a disruption, but in March 2012 Apple was already looking to a smaller format, nanoSIM. Nokia produced its own design, which gained Motorola and RIM's support.



Apple's design required a tray for the nanoSIM, which Nokia, Moto and RIM saw as unnecessary. Apple eventually got its way and both Nokia and Motorola have produced compatible nanoSIM devices. The other major makers are still sticking to microSIM, though.

In March 2010, a different kind of card was in the spotlight - the 32GB microSD card from SanDisk. We scoffed a bit at the price - $200 - but it was huge storage to put in such a small format.



Four years later at MWC 2014 SanDisk presented the first 128GB microSD card - it took the company four years to quadruple the storage. Price stayed the same though, the highest capacity card in 2014 is priced $200, just like the one in 2010.

App shopping

App stores are typically tied to their respective platform and the parent company keeps a tight rein on them - Microsoft is the main authority when it comes to Windows apps and Apple watches over the App Store like a hawk.

You can imagine the surprise of the Cupertino company when in March 2011 Amazon unveiled the Appstore (one word, no capital S). It was an Android-based app store and seemed like a surprising move - sure, Amazon had plenty of digital content, but that was music and movies, no software.






Later that year we found out this was just the opening move of a grander plan - fork Android, make an affordable tablet and use it to push the other digital content. We're talking about the Kindle Fire, of course.

The free app promotions (that run to this day) were just the bait from Amazon to get you into its services. The Kindle Fire has evolved and now rivals flagship tablets of other companies.

Not that Google was going to worry over it - the Android Market (later renamed Play Store) was busy catching up to its real competitor, the Apple App Store, but it wasn't up to...</p>

Source: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login