Virtual Machines Deployed on the Sly

[Sunite]

Virtual Machines Deployed on the Sly
By Johanna Ambrosio
October 4, 2007 12:59PM

   Digg It!   Bookmark to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
David Hodge, a manager at Systech, is one I.T. staffer who doesn't tell his vendors and end users about virtualization projects right away. "We're one of those vendors that doesn't allow our customers to do virtualization, but I'm off in my corner doing it," he said. "It makes my job easier to just put it out there and then tell [users] later."

Related Topics
   Virtualization
   Servers
   Data Centers
   Licensing
   Software
   Operating Systems

Latest News
   AMD Intros Quad-Core Spider Platform
   Google Mulls Bid for Wireless Spectrum
   Amazon Unveils Kindle E-Book Reader
   Dell Launches Iconic All-in-One PC
   Recycling Electronics Boosts Pollution
Advertisement

Advertisement

   The promise of virtualization technology has convinced some companies to require that most new applications be run immediately on virtual machines.

Such a rush to virtual servers is certainly under way at The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co., where "the standard is that everything new comes in on virtual servers," said Bruno Janssens, senior architect in the company's infrastructure Relevant Products/Services services group.

A dozen of the Simsbury, Conn.-based insurer's 5,000 servers are currently virtualized, as are some 500 Windows XP client machines, he said.

However, I.T. managers at some companies can feel forced to hide plans from users and vendors in order to overcome potential objections to virtualization, said users and analysts attending Computerworld's Infrastructure Management World (IMW) conference, held recently in Scottsdale, Ariz.

In some cases, end users object to virtualization because they're concerned that virtual machines lack the security Relevant Products/Services and performance of dedicated servers.

At the same time, many I.T. operations must deal with vendors that either prohibit them from implementing their software on virtual machines or establish convoluted pricing schemes for the right to do so.

Companies are taking a variety of measures to overcome such obstacles, including adopting "don't ask, don't tell" policies in order to get virtual applications running without notifying users and vendors.

In the latest installment of a twice-yearly survey by The InfoPro, a New York-based consulting Relevant Products/Services firm, about 40% of respondents from 150 large companies said they aren't asking business units for permission to implement server virtualization.

"Server pros are saying, 'I guarantee [service-level agreements], and the users don't need to know how I do it,' " said Bob Gill, director of server research at InfoPro.

Some I.T. professionals at the conference defended decisions to keep users out of the loop, while others said such dishonest dealings could prove tricky.

"It's not like we're hiding anything," said Wendy Saadi, a virtualization project manager for the city government of Mesa, Ariz.

"The application analysts know, and they'll raise objections if they see any problems out beforehand," she said. "My users don't care what servers we run their applications on, for the most part, as long as it all works."

However, Saadi noted that an initial effort by a small Mesa I.T. team to implement virtualization without notifying users -- or the rest of the I.T. organization -- did force a change in direction. (continued...)

1  |  2  |  3  |  Next Page >



© 2007 Computerworld. All rights reserved.
© 2007 NewsFactor Network. All rights reserved.