Supreme Court rulings won't end lawsuits
(AP)
<p><img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20080628/capt.6131e06067ee4f65983612ee28dd08f1.death_penalty_ny470.jpg?x=130&y=86&q=85&sig=dXaVHpS7Bo9ZcLE5UE.QtQ--" align="left" height="86" width="130" alt="This bag, used in the first Texas execution by lethal injection, is shown on display at the Prison Museum Tuesday, May 27, 2008 in Huntsville, Texas. For decades, the Supreme Court declined to address execution methods and whether such punishment should apply to child rapists. In its latest term, the court addressed both, but neither ruling solves capital punishment arguments. Instead, there will be even more litigation claiming lethal injection causes extreme suffering, say death penalty opponents. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)" border="0" /> (http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/us/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080628/ap_on_re_us/death_penalty)AP - For at least a decade, the Supreme Court has declined to rule on the use of lethal injections and whether the death penalty applies to anyone who rapes a child. In its term ending Friday, the high court issued decisions on both, but neither solves the bitter fight over capital punishment.</p><br clear="all"/>
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/us/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080628/ap_on_re_us/death_penalty