More? What the Dickens are you talking about?
LONDON (Reuters) - Oliver Twist wouldn't have needed any more gruel in real life, scientists said Thursday.<div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews?d=41" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews?a=mPLkiVD7) <img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews?i=qlMk6Mvw" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews?a=qlMk6Mvw) <img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~f/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews?i=qXUgZQe0" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.reuters.com/~f/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews?a=qXUgZQe0)
</div><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews/~4/wuyxuA3NxLU" height="1" width="1"/>
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/oddlyEnoughNews/~3/wuyxuA3NxLU/idUSTRE4BH60N20081218