Download SEO Book Torrent: Should Google Recommend That?
<p>In the following video Matt Cutts highlighted that he did not feel that the update (http://www.seobook.com/google-branding) was driven by brand, but more in concepts of trust, PageRank, and authority:
<object width="480" height="295">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LMfWPWUh5uU&hl=en&fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LMfWPWUh5uU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>
RankPulse, a tool I used in my analysis of the algorithm change, is powered by the Google SOAP API, which Google will soon stop supporting (http://googleajaxsearchapi.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-code-labs-and-soap-search-api.html). Matt played down the size of the algorithm update made by a Googler named Vince. But John Andrews takes a contrarian view (http://www.johnon.com/649/thewrong-searchengine.html), looking at Google's behavior after the algorithm update was analyzed:</p>
<p>You might say that Google’s API,via custom third-party innovations like RankPulse.com, enabled us to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful†(which is Google’s corporate mission statement, by the way).</p>
<p>It sure seems contradictory for Google, a company based on the collection and permanent storage of others’ web page content, to forbid others from doing the same. It is also quite egregious for Google to expect to operate secretly, with no accountability (such as might be obtained through archiving of Google results), when Google exerts so much influence over Internet commerce.</p>
<p> One of Google's initial complaints, as mentioned by Joshua Sciarrino (http://www.joshuasciarrino.com/), was that search information was too secretive (http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html):</p>
<p>At the same time, search engines have migrated from the academic domain to the commercial. Up until now most search engine development has gone on at companies with little publication of technical details. This causes search engine technology to remain largely a black art and to be advertising oriented (see Appendix A). With Google, we have a strong goal to push more development and understanding into the academic realm.......However, it is very difficult to get this (academic) data, mainly because it is considered commercially valuable.</p>
<p>As Google gobbles up your content while shielding its results from
unauthorized access, it creates a weakness which a new search service could exploit...by being far more open. </p>
<p>While Google doesn't want anyone to access their proprietary business secrets, if you search for my brand they recommend you look for a torrent to go download an old copy of my ebook.
(http://www.seobook.com/images/seo-book-torrent.gif)
sounds like a fair trade, eh? No big deal. Google is a common carrier (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/remove-page-from-google/), and intends to use that to their business advantage whenever and wherever possible (http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00001619.html).
(http://www.mattcutts.com/images/kill-a-webpage.jpg)
I hope you (and your business model) are not allergic to peanuts!</p>
http://www.seobook.com/download-seo-book-torrent-should-google-recommend