SEO Tricks: Where Do New SEOs Go Wrong When They Set Learning Priorities?

[SEO Manager]

Where Do New SEOs Go Wrong When They Set Learning Priorities?
 

<p><img src="/images/blackboard.jpg"></p>
<p>Another question we received recently from the SEOBook.com community was: </p>

<p>
What qualities are common in Aaron Wall, DaveN, Bob Massa, Jason Duke, SugarRae, et al, that new SEOs can adopt, to come closer to people like these in expertise. Where do most new SEOs go wrong when they set learning priorities?
</p>

<p>I've asked these people to provide their views, which I'll get to shortly. </p>
<p>It's a great question, because the avalanche of SEO information that confronts the beginner can be overwhelming. How do you know what information is important? What aspects do you really need to spend you time on, and what information do you need to reject? What are the qualities that make for a good SEO?</p>
<p>Let's take a look...</p>
<h3>Learning SEO</h3>
<p>Most people stumble into being an SEO.</p>
<p>An awareness of SEO usually comes about when a person launches a site, only to find that the site doesn't magically appear #1. </p>
<p>Soon after, the webmaster will likely find themselves knee deep in SEO forums and blogs, where everyone has a viewpoint, and often those viewpoints contradict each other. Contradiction is rife in SEO. To understand why, we need to understand the history of search engines.</p>
<p>The first step in setting learning priorities for SEO is to.....</p>
<h3>1. Understand The History &amp; Context Of SEO</h3>
<p>My own foray into SEO began with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.</p>
<p>Infoseek was one of the early search engines. Infoseek introduced a feature around 1996 , whereby they would crawl a site and update their index immediately. This feature made it easy for webmasters to game the algorithm.</p>
<p>I had just launched a small, commercial site. I thought all I had to do was publish a site, and the search engine would do it's job, and put me at number one! Unsurprisingly, that didn't happen. </p>
<p>So, I tried to figure out why Infoseek didn't think my site was great. I could see that there were sites ranking above mine, so there was clearly something about those sites that Infoseek did like. I looked at the code of the high ranking sites. Did that have something to do with it? To test that idea, I cut and pasted it their code into my own code and republished my site. Viola, I was at number 2!</p>
<p>So far, so good.</p>
<p>But why wasn't I number one? The sites that were ranking highly tended to have long pages on the same topic, so I added more text to my pages. Soon enough, with a little trial and error, I was number one. Predictably, Infoseek soon pulled this feature when they saw what was happening.  </p>
<p>I was clearly not alone in my underhanded trickery.</p>
<p>At the time, I thought my cut n paste trick was an amusing hack, but I wasn't earning my bread and butter from the internet. I was working in the computer industry, and unaware of "SEO". I soon forgot about it.</p>
<p>A few years later, a whole cottage industry had sprung up around SEO. The search technology had become a lot more sophisticated. My dubious copy n' paste hack no longer worked, as the search engines were locked in a war against webmasters who were trying to game their ranking criteria. </p>
<p>Any SEO operating at the time would soon discover that it wasn't enough to follow a prescriptive set of rules for their own pages.  They also needed to get links from other sites pointing back. This was still easy to fake - there were plenty of link farms at the time - but a young upstart called Google changed that. Their algorithms took the link evaluation model further, making rank more and more difficult to manipulate.</p>
<p>There is an inherent conflict between the business model of the search engine, and that of the SEO. The SEO wants their site to rank, the search engine wants to rank a page a searcher will find useful. </p>
<p>That isn't necessarily the same thing.</p>
<p>Therefore, the search engines are notoriously secret about their ranking formulas. SEOs try and reverse engineer the formulas, or just guess the factors involved, which is why you'll see so many contradictory viewpoints. </p>
<p>So who do you listen to? What information is relevant?</p>
<h3>2. Technical Know-How</h3>
<p>You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, one of the UKs top SEOs, had this to say about doing too much at once:</p>

<p>
Common qualities that's simple we notice the little things and understand the larger impact that they will have in long term,</p>
<p>And where do you most new SEOs go wrong when they set learning priorities?</p>
<p>From the new SEO's on the block that I chat too, they seem to run at a million miles an hour trying 100 different things at once, they need to slow get a decent data set of information and slowly pick though it and test small things at a time, and work out thing like why is it when I search for The FT in Google it returns Grand Theft Auto ?
</p>

<p>Most people new to SEO place a lot of emphasis on the technical aspects. It's natural to seek out the secret recipe of high rankings. Whilst most forums obsess over these issues, much of what you'll read is irrelevant fluff. These days, SEO is more about a holistic process, rather than an end unto itself.</p>
<p>Start with a solid, credible source - like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login for example The cost of a well researched course is nothing compared to the time you may spend heading in the wrong direction.</p>
<p>Most people will benefit by applying the 80/20 rule. To rank in Google, you need to be on-topic, you need to be crawlable, and you need to have inbound links.</p>
<p>You could spend a lifetime trying to figure out the other 20%. Unfortunately, the formula is in Google's hands, and even then, only known to a few. It is reasonable to assume Google tweaks the dials often, especially once a common exploit makes the rounds. Take Dave's advice and take it one step at a time.  Focus on the key aspects first - relevance, crawlability and linking - then methodically test and evaluate in order to expand your knowledge. </p>
<p>You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login on not sweating the small stuff: </p>

<p>
I honestly think the only way anyone can go wrong, new to online promotion of a seasoned veteran, is to look too hard for tricks and magic beans from those who make their names posting those so-called tricks, in forums.</p>
<p>I believe anyone can be successful at online marketing or even traffic generation and search engine placement specifically, if they just stop looking for ways to trick machines and instead look for ways to connect with humans.</p>
<p>search engines are just computer programs and algorithms written by humans. The engine is only a tool intended to aide humans do things faster and easier that are important to their lives. I think machines can help with connecting humans BUT  the humans are the target, the goal, the end that machines can provide the means to.</p>
<p>I think one thing that is common among the list of people you mentioned is that they all realize, understand and accept that concept.
</p>

<h3>3. Strategy &amp; Goals</h3>
<p>The opportunity in SEO lies in the fact that Google must have content, around which it places advertising. If you rank high, you get "free" clicks. </p>
<p>Of course, nothing in this world is free, and SEO is no exception. There is significant time cost involved in getting lucrative rankings. And that cost comes with a reasonable degree of risk. Google has no obligation to show you at position x, and your competitors will always try and eat your lunch.</p>
<p>Strategy is the most important aspect, and one you should spend a lot of your time on. Why are you trying to rank? Are there better things you could be doing i.e. building up a community? Do you have an on-going publishing model? How is your brochure-web site ever going to attract links? Are you building enough link juice to ensure your entire 500K page affiliate site gets indexed? </p>
<p>Check out my post on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.  The key is to take a holistic approach. </p>

<p>
I think some of the general principals that apply to most of them are that they are: smart, curious, hard working, blunt, honest, and sharing. They also view SEO as a tool to help them achieve other goals, rather than having SEO be the end goal. </p>
<p>Where a lot of people go wrong with SEO is that they try to think in concrete numbers based on a limited perspective built off a limited set of data. Some things may happen sometimes, but there are very few universal truths to the shifting field of SEO beyond preparing for change. And the certain lasting truths do not provide much competitive advantage...that is built through curiosity, testing, hard work,  and creativity - Aaron Wall.
</p>

<h3>4. Measurement</h3>
<p>It's surprising how little time is spent talking about measurement, because without it, SEOs are flying blind.</p>
<p>One common metric is rank. It's not a very good metric, because it doesn't tell you very much, other than you've won the ranking game.</p>
<p>But so what?</p>
<p>What if that rank doesn't help you achieve your goals? What if every person who clicks on your link ends up buying from the guy who is advertising on Adwords instead?</p>
<p>This is why measurement, aligned with your goals, is important. If you track SEO efforts through to a goal, and most of those goals tend to involve making money, then you'll be head and shoulders above most of the forum hacks and pretenders. It doesn't matter what tracking software you use. Become an expert and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.</p>
<h3>Summary</h3>
<ul>
<li>1. Understand the history and context of SEO</li>
<li>2. Learn your chops from a reputable source</li>
<li>3. Clearly define your strategy and goals</li>
<li>4. Become a metrics and measurement guru</li>
</ul>

 

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login