SEO Tricks: 'Professional' Content vs Content Actually Worth Reading

[SEO Manager]

'Professional' Content vs Content Actually Worth Reading
 

<p>Some media executives are You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login about Google ranking blogs and sites not controlled by the mainstream media. Of course Google has been You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, and even includes trusted news partners directly in the search results for recent news items. But that is not enough to make bloated media companies profitable. </p>

<p>"The original source, and the source with real access, should somehow be recognized as the most important in the delivery of results."</p>

<p>Google subsidizes these media companies with additional exposure by </p>
<ul>
<li>weighting domain authority</li>
<li>giving them first mover advantage in the search rankings (through direct inclusion of recent news results in the organic search results)</li>
<li>featuring their content (yet again) in their news search product</li>
<li>favoring informational content over commercial content</li>
</ul>
<p>If a big business has "real access" and yet loses out to people rewriting the story, it means the original source did one (or more) of the following</p>
<ul>
<li>did a pretty crummy job of reporting</li>
<li>did a pretty crummy job of SEO</li>
<li>erected barriers that made them not linkworthy</li>
<li>fought off niche brands with a generic brand that does not resonate as well with the market</li>
</ul>
<p>Google could give these media companies almost 100% of the search traffic and many would still go bankrupt because their business models simply do not fit the web. Online ad rates are lower, most of the media infrastructure is unneeded bloat, and individuals and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.</p>
<p>When I click the publish button, 10's of thousands of people will read this post. Its not your fault or my fault that big media was too lazy to create niche brands offering relevant regularly updated content.</p>
<p>Ironically, the quote from AdAge, begging for coverage of the original source, did not have a name on it. You can quote it, but there is no source. These clowns whine about something and are not willing to put their names behind their own words. Maybe that has something to do with why people would rather read elsewhere.  </p>
<p>This is the same media that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login (while people were still dying), and missed the financial terrorism occurring back home. Why again is the original source more important than those who You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login? </p>
<p>If the relevancy algorithms are your enemy, then maybe your work is no longer relevant.</p>
<p>Maybe they can You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.</p>

 

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login