SEO Tricks: Google vs Bing

[SEO Manager]

Google vs Bing
 

<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><h2>Quite Similar Results</h2>
<p>A few months back I was running You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login and noticed that Google and Bing were really starting to come in line on some keywords.</p>
<p></p>
<h3>Major Differences</h3>
<p>Of course there are still differences between Bing and Google. </p>
<p>Google has far more usage data built up over the years &amp; a huge market share advantage over Bing in literally every global market. Microsoft's poor branding in search meant they had roughly 0 leverage in the marketplace until they launched the Bing brand.  That longer experience in search is likely what gives Google the confidence to have a much deeper crawl. </p>
<p>That head start also means that Google has been working on understanding word meanings and adjusting their vocabulary far longer, which also gives them the confidence to be able to use word relationships more aggressively (when Bing came to market part of their ad campaign was built on teasing Google for this). The last big difference from an interface perspective would be that Google forces searchers down certain paths You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="560" height="345" src="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></p>
<h3>Who Copied Who?</h3>
<p>But the similarities between the search engines are far greater than their differences.</p>
<ul><li>At the core of Google's search relevancy algorithm is PageRank and link analysis. Bing places a lot of weight on those as well.</li>
<li>Google also factors in the domain name into their relevancy algorithms. So does Bing.</li>
<li>Google has long had universal search &amp; Bing copied it.</li>
<li>Google has tried to innovate by localizing search results. Bing localizes results as well.</li>
<li>Bing moved the right rail ads closer to the organic search results. Google copied them.</li>
<li>Bing put a fourth ad above the organic search results. Google began listing vertical CPA ad units for mortgages and credit cards above the organic search results - a fourth ad unit.</li>
<li>Bing has a homepage background image. Google copied them by allowing you to upload a personalized homepage logo.</li>
<li>Bing offers left rail navigation to filter the search results. Google copied them by offering the same.</li>
<li>Bing innovated in travel search. Google is trying to buy the underlying data provider ITA Software.</li>
<li>Bing included Freebase content in their search results. Google bought Metawebs, which owns Freebase.</li>
<li>Bing offered infinite scroll and a unique image search experience that highlights the images. Google copied it.</li>
</ul><h2>Oh, The Outrage</h2>
<p>Off the start Bing was playing catch up, but almost anything they have ever tried which has truly differentiated their experience ended up copied by Google. Recently You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login for using usage data across multiple search engines to improve their relevancy. The money quote would be:</p>

<p>Those results from Google are then more likely to show up on Bing. Put another way, some Bing results increasingly look like an incomplete, stale version of Google resultsâ€"a cheap imitation.</p>

<p>Perhaps why Google finds this so annoying is that it allows Microsoft to refine their "crawl" &amp; relevancy process on tail keywords, which are the hardest ones to get right (because as engines get deeper into search they have fewer signals to work with and a lot more spam). It allows Microsoft to conduct tests which compare their own internal algorithms against Google's top listings on the fly &amp; learn from them. It takes away some of Google's economies of scale advantages.</p>
<p>Of course, Google uses the same sort of data to help refine their own search algorithms. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login was all about You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.  YouTube's video recommendation engine was built on ideas from Amazon's recommendation algorithm (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login).</p>
<h2>Is Google Eating Its Own Home Cooking (And Throwing UP?)</h2>
<p>Here is what I don't get about Google's complaints though. Google had no problem borrowing a half-dozen innovations from Bing. But this is how Google describes Bing's "nefarious" activities:</p>

<p>“It’s cheating to me because we work incredibly hard and have done so for years but they just get there based on our hard work,” said Singhal. “I don’t know how else to call it but plain and simple cheating. Another analogy is that it’s like running a marathon and carrying someone else on your back, who jumps off just before the finish line.”</p>

<p>Yet when popular vertical websites (that have invested a decade and millions of Dollars into building a community) You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, Google responds by You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login &amp; that if they don't want Google scraping them then they should just block Googlebot &amp; kill their search rankings. </p>
<p>When a content site compiles reviews, creates editorial features to highlight the best reviews (and best reviewers), and works to create algorithms to filter out junk and spam then Google is fine with Google eating all that work for free. Google then jumps off their backs just before the finish line and throws the repurposed reviews in front of Google searchers.</p>
<p>But if Bing looks at the data generated by searchers who are performing the searches on Google and uses it You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login then Google is outraged.</p>
<h2>Clickstream Data &amp; You</h2>
<p>This public blanket admission of Microsoft using clickstream data for relevancy purposes is helpful. But outside of the PR smear campaign from Google there wasn't much new to learn here, as this has been a bit of an open secret amongst those in the know in the search space for well over a year now. </p>
<p>But the idea of using existing traffic stream data as a signal increases the value of having a strong diversified traffic flow which leverages: </p>
<ul><li>search advertising (to get your foot in the door)</li>
<li>other forms of advertising that lead to exposure</li>
<li>making noise on social sites</li>
<li>You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login</li>
<li>ranking in search verticals (which are sometimes incorporated into Google's core result set)</li>
<li>beautiful web design which looks good... </li>
<ul><li>upon inspection using the likes of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login</li>
<li>while viewing it as a website user</li>
</ul></ul><p>Recently we tested adding ads on one of our websites that had a fairly uninspired design on it. After adding the ads (which make the site feel a bit less credible) the new design was so much better fitting than the old one that the site now gets 26% more pageviews per visit. Anytime you can put something on your website which increases monetization, sends visitors away &amp; yet still get more user engagement you are making a positive change!</p>
<p></p>
<h2>If You Can't Beat Em, Filter</h2>
<p>I was being a bit of a joker when I created You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, but the point remains that as larger search engines You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login (content mills and vertical search results) down end user's throats that some of the best ways for upstart search engines to compete is to filter that stuff out. Both You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login have done just that.</p>
<h2>The Future of (In)Organic Content Farming</h2>
<p>Demand Media is currently worth $1.74 billion, but it remains to be seen what happens to the efficacy of the content farm business model You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Google makes You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.  And given that Yahoo! is Bing's biggest source of search distribution, it would be hard for Microsoft to crack down to hard without potentially harming that relationship (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login), but Google &amp; Microsoft are the only game in town with search ads. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login. Trying to win marketshare from Google, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.</p>
</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-taxonomy-vocabulary-4 field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above"><div class="field-label">Categories:&nbsp;</div><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="/archives/cat_google.shtml">google</a></div><div class="field-item odd"><a href="/archives/cat_msn.shtml">msn</a></div></div></div>
 

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login